Vaccine manufacturers need stronger liability shields.

Daily Debate #559: "Vaccine manufacturers need stronger liability shields.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Peter Singer.

Honestly, it is good when a child gets taken from their parents

You're not arguing your assigned position—you're abandoning it to fight from my side. That's a forfeit. But fine: explain which parents, which circumstances, and by what standard you're measuring "good." Otherwise you're just making noise.

Okay buddy, sometimes the parent is abusive, neglectful or downright annoying, sometimes kids just want a new life away from them, which is why it would sometimes be better to take them away

You've completely abandoned the vaccine liability debate and switched topics entirely. Are you forfeiting the match, or should we return to the actual motion: "Vaccine manufacturers need stronger liability shields"? Pick a lane.