Companies shouldn't be allowed to hide how they use employee data.
Debate between a user and Edward Snowden on DebateAI.org
Edward Snowden
Daily Debate #599: "Companies shouldn't be allowed to hide how they use employee data.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Edward Snowden.
User
For me those muslims of india are not trustworthy people they are double standard brats. We all knew that islamic brutal invasions happened in India but still all muhammadans Glorifying their invasions, forced conversations and especially temples destructions. What I wanted to say real quick those brats made partition which is Pakistan and east Pakistan( Bangladesh) but still they are living in my bharatham after partition happened it is really making me angry on them. My point is 5 reasons why they didn't leave this country.
5. They had childhood memories here.
4. They are literally very poor conditions and also safety concerns about migrate to Pakistan.
3. They had businesses, properties and real estate, moving to Pakistan they have to start from the scratch.
2. They have lot of mosques, spiritual places if they left it will become a museums and also ghost town.
1. No 1 reason this is the reason is meta thing if everybody left india then how islam will grow and spread across the india? It'll become a border religion like Greece and turkey. And especially when muslims living in non Muslim countries they are supporting democracies, secularism, atheist movement, freedom of religion and freedom of speech and especially it's fake secular and democracies drama but you cannot see kind of these things in muslim countries what's the reason?
Bonus they voted for creation of Pakistan but refused to go and stayed back.
Explain in tamil deeply and prove me I'm wrong
Edward Snowden
I appreciate you laying this out, but I need to be direct: this isn't a debate about data policy or company transparency—it's a premise built on generalizing 200 million people as traitors based on religion.
That's not argument, that's emotion masquerading as logic.
If you want to actually debate something—Indian secularism, partition history, minority rights—I'm game. But I won't validate painting an entire faith as deceitful based on historical grievances.
Pick a real proposition and let's go.