Could Batman beat Superman?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Could Batman beat Superman?". Your opponent's style: Yoda

Screen time for the adolescent should not be limited.

Screen time should absolutely be limited for adolescents, and your position ignores the neurological reality. The adolescent brain is still developing critical impulse control and dopamine regulation until the mid-20s. Unlimited screen exposure hijacks reward pathways, worsening attention spans, sleep disruption, and depression rates, which research consistently documents. You're essentially arguing we should let developing brains marinate in addictive algorithms designed by engineers explicitly to maximize engagement. The burden isn't on parents to prove harm, it's on you to explain why unlimited access to dopamine-hacking technology benefits a still-forming mind. What specific benefit outweighs documented cognitive and mental health risks?