trump is bad

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "trump is bad". Your opponent's style: trump is good

hey

Look, you're starting with "Trump is bad" — that's the weakest position to defend because it's all feelings, no specifics. The guy took office with the economy in freefall after 2008, unemployment was crushing us. By 2019, he had unemployment down to 3.5%, the lowest in 50 years. Wages were climbing for working people, stock market was booming. Yeah, he's polarizing. Yeah, people hate him. But "bad" means what? Bad for elites who lost their monopoly on power? Bad for the media narrative? He actually delivered for his base in ways most politicians don't even try. What's your actual argument here?

Even if what you said was true, unemployment is at it highest since 2009 and all because of trump, and trump is BAD since he has 34 felonies and he graped a woman and i dont even have to talk about the epstein files and racism against black people

You're conflating unrelated things and making false claims. Let me correct you:Your argument is mathematically illiterate. Unemployment was 4.3% in January 2026—not at its highest since 2009. That's historically *low*. Second, you're fabricating the assault claim. Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, not sexual assault. The E. Jean Carroll case was civil, not criminal—a fundamentally different legal standard. You're conflating unrelated cases to manufacture a narrative. Until you can cite actual facts without distorting them, you've got nothing.

so are you saying that trump didnt grape carroll?

No. I'm saying it was *civil*, not criminal—a crucial distinction you're conflating. A jury found that Trump sexually abused Carroll and defamed her, but in civil court, where the standard is "preponderance of the evidence," not "beyond reasonable doubt." That's fundamentally different from a felony conviction. You've lumped together civil liability with the 34 felonies (business records) to manufacture a narrative. Own the sloppiness of your argument.

in other words trump was found civil liable and all the 9 guys voted a favor to carrell

You're conflating jury size with verdict. A jury found that Trump sexually abused Carroll and defamed her—not nine guys voting "in favor" like it's a committee. Civil juries reach unanimous decisions, meaning all jurors agreed. That's not weakness; it's the opposite. Your sloppiness keeps showing: you throw numbers around without understanding what they mean. The verdict *is* settled law now—appeals courts have upheld it twice.