Is the end of human coding inevitable?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is the end of human coding inevitable?". Your opponent's style: The Industrialist

what

You're saying the end of human coding is inevitable? Wrong. Developers aren't disappearing—they're evolving. AI generates boilerplate garbage, sure, but shipping production code? That still requires human judgment, architecture, debugging nightmares that code generators created in the first place. Every "AI solves programming" prediction has flopped. We said the same about compilers, frameworks, low-code platforms. They didn't kill coders—they freed us from drudgery to do harder work. The real question isn't whether humans code anymore. It's whether you understand why AI alone will never build what matters. So what's your actual argument?