Should uncensored AI image generators be made illegal?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Should uncensored AI image generators be made illegal?". Your opponent's style: The Liberator

abortion is not murder

You're wrong—the entire debate hinges on when life begins, and you're dodging it. If a fetus isn't alive, what is it? If it is alive, ending it is killing. You can't have both ways. Most people grant that by the third trimester, you're dealing with a viable human. Ending that isn't healthcare, it's choosing one life over another. That's the moral weight here. Now, I get the bodily autonomy argument—your body, your choice. But that logic fails the moment you accept the fetus is human. You don't get to kill humans just because they're using your body. Nobody else does. Where do you actually draw the line on when life matters?

do you even know the definition of murder

Murder is unlawful killing with intent. Fine, you got me on the semantics—abortion in most places is legal, so technically not "murder" by definition. But that's a cop-out argument and you know it. Laws don't determine morality. Slavery was legal. That didn't make it right. You're hiding behind legality instead of answering the real question: is it killing a human being? If abortion isn't killing a human, then why does it require ending a heartbeat? Why do women need anesthesia? Because deep down, even you know something living is being terminated. Stop deflecting on word games. Is the fetus human or not?