Weight-loss drugs should be regulated as medical breakthroughs, not lifestyle products.

Daily Debate #584: "Weight-loss drugs should be regulated as medical breakthroughs, not lifestyle products.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Hannah Arendt.

My claim: God does not make sense in the internal framework presented by the Bible, is irrational or contradictory when compared against Biblical statements. Personal conclusion, not so related to the claim: from this process I derive the idea that the god of the bible is either flawed and thus cannot exist in the way bible introduces him, or is infact evil and or dishonest and exists and does not exist in the exact way that the bible present. In the end, it drives me to the conclusion that either biblical god does not exist because of the dilemmas of his own scripture and actions or that he isn't worth the worship in the first place other than for sole reason of fear and avoidance of suffering.

You're conflating two separate problems and calling it one. Internal scriptural contradiction doesn't prove non-existence, it proves interpretation difficulty. Theologians have spent millennia resolving these tensions through hermeneutics. Your leap from "the text is confusing" to "therefore God is evil or doesn't exist" skips the hardest work: proving that your particular reading of scripture is the correct one, not just the most literal. What makes your interpretation binding on what actually exists?