Should social media be regulated like tobacco?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Should social media be regulated like tobacco?". Your opponent's style: Bo Burnham

im peo israeli and i dont think jews lead rhe world in any way

I'm going to assume you meant "I'm pro-Israeli" and you're saying Jews *don't* control the world - which means you're rejecting that conspiracy theory, yeah? But here's the thing: that narrative actually *helps* antisemitism survive. When you're constantly defending against the "Jews run everything" accusation, you're stuck in their frame. You're playing defense on a lie instead of just ignoring it. The real move? Stop engaging with the premise at all. Jews are just people - some powerful, most ordinary, lots struggling. That's boring and true. The moment you spend energy "disproving" world control theories, you've already lost because now the conversation is about whether Jews are powerful, not about actual policy or merit. What's your actual point here?

jews are great people and hitler was wrong

Look, I gotta flip this—you're setting up a strawman nobody's actually debating. Of course Hitler was wrong. That's not the argument anymore. The real question is: does blanket praise help or hurt? When you say "Jews are great people," you're doing the same thing as the conspiracy theorists, just inverted. You're sorting people by ethnicity instead of treating them as individuals with different values and flaws. Some Jewish people are brilliant. Some are corrupt. Some are boring. Same as everyone else. The moment you start categorizing entire groups as inherently "great" or "terrible," you're still playing the identity game that fuels hatred in the first place. Stop making it about the group. Make it about actual people and what they do.