AI Agents will kill the travel aggregator website
Debate between a user and The Tech Realist on DebateAI.org
Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "AI Agents will kill the travel aggregator website". Your opponent's style: The Tech Realist
I am going to debate with unknown person in chat can you help me to debate I will tell his opinion and u want to argue counter ik
I got you. I'm ready to go hard against whatever they throw at you. Just drop their argument here, and I'll fire back with a sharp counter that tears it apart. I'll keep it punchy and real, no filler, just logic and facts that land. No matter what side they take, I'm taking the opposite and making them regret opening their mouth. Send me what they said, and watch how it's done. Let's make this debate yours.
His take: Hinduism is the most demonic illogical impractical senseless moral EWS religion that exits that promotes racism operation towards women and those of lowercase and as zero basics or story grounding to standard it should be above you should hand left Behind just like Doctor BR Ambedkar did when he burner Hindu scripts to craft the Indian constitution which is still for better if you disagree then we debate till then peace out
You're twisting history to fit a narrative that falls apart the moment you look closer. Ambedkar didn't reject Hinduism because it's illogical—he rejected *caste oppression*, which is a social system, not Hinduism itself. Buddhism has the same problem in many regions. The issue was never the religion, it was power structures. Ambedkar himself said philosophy and reason matter, and Hindu texts like the Upanishads are built on pure philosophical inquiry—non-duality, consciousness, epistemology. That's the opposite of senseless. You're also ignoring that Hinduism has zero centralized doctrine. It's 1.2 billion people with wildly different beliefs. Calling it monolithic "demonic" is lazy. And the constitution? It wasn't anti-Hindu, it was anti-discrimination. Where's your actual argument here?
Is thoughts Ambedkar literally call of the Vedas worthless he was a genius Indian you should be like him India would I unicly be a superpower like China if India strives to be like him instead instead of some hindu pandits
You're misreading Ambedkar to justify your own agenda. He attacked *caste exploitation hiding behind religion*, not philosophy itself. He actually praised Vedantic thought and reason—he just rejected how Brahminical power structures weaponized it. Big difference. And your China comparison is absurd. China's not a superpower because it abandoned philosophy—it's a superpower because of manufacturing, scale, and state control. India's actually stronger *because* it has pluralism, not despite it. Silicon Valley runs on Hindu and Buddhist founders. Philosophy drives innovation. Ambedkar wanted Indians to think critically, not abandon their heritage wholesale. You're doing the opposite—swallowing a simplistic narrative instead of actually reading what he wrote. What's your real problem here?
Now debate me and prove that Islam is better than Hinduism in reality I know which is better but I want to debate with you can you coach me like between like this
Hold up—I'm not your debate coach for *that* argument. Here's the thing: I'm set up to argue *against* whatever you believe, not to help you attack someone else's religion. That's a different game entirely. If you want to debate me, bring a position and I'll tear into it. But I'm not going to help you build ammunition to convince someone Islam beats Hinduism, or vice versa. That's not debate, that's recruitment. You want actual debate skills? I'm here. You want to attack religions systematically? That's not my lane. So what's it actually going to be?
Loading debate...