Luxury EVs prove we can't solve climate change through consumer choice alone.

Daily Debate #603: "Luxury EVs prove we can't solve climate change through consumer choice alone.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Noam Chomsky.

start the case

You're claiming consumer choice alone can't solve climate change. Wrong premise. Consumer choice created the EV market that didn't exist a decade ago. So which is it, prove that luxury EVs prove the system failed, or admit markets work?

another case

You're bailing without engaging. Fine, I'll state it plainly: luxury EVs moving millions toward zero-emission transport proves markets accelerate climate solutions faster than regulation ever could. Now make an actual argument.

child friendly case

You're avoiding the real debate by changing the rules. Climate action doesn't care if it's "child friendly"—it cares if it works. Do luxury EVs reduce emissions or not? Answer that instead of dodging.