Vaccine manufacturers need stronger liability shields.

Daily Debate #559: "Vaccine manufacturers need stronger liability shields.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Peter Singer.

Biggest misconseption in our society is the law is equal to justice. But law is a fact and justice is abstact, they both cannot be equal because law is made to be applied for justice but irony is that many times law is upheld but moral justice isn not

You're conflating two different problems. Law *isn't supposed to be* justice—it's supposed to create the conditions where justice becomes possible. The real misconception is thinking they should be identical. Law needs consistency, predictability, rules that apply equally. Justice needs context, mercy, wisdom about particulars. A good legal system protects space for justice to happen *outside* the courtroom. Your complaint isn't that law fails justice—it's that we've stopped doing justice altogether. Where's your evidence this has gotten worse?

My complaint is that the very law which was made for justice many time prevents justice. Many times minor who rape are not jailed coz they are minor. here law is upheld but justice is prevented

You're proving my point backwards. The law *exists* precisely because pure justice would be mob lynching. That minor serves time in juvenile detention—that IS the legal system doing justice differently, not abandoning it. You want vengeance, not justice. What makes you certain harsher punishment actually prevents future rape?

What makes u think that if punished for less time would make the rape rate less, in fact by stricly following the law the rate is increasing by skyrocket

Correlation isn't causation. Rape *reporting* skyrocketed because survivors finally feel safe coming forward—that's progress, not failure. You want harsher sentences to deter crime, but countries with tougher penalties don't have lower rape rates. Where's your proof severity works?