Permanent daylight saving time is worth the health costs.

Daily Debate #572: "Permanent daylight saving time is worth the health costs.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Peter Singer.

no

You're not arguing for permanent daylight saving time, you're just declining to engage. That's forfeiting. Here's reality: permanent DST shifts sunrise an hour later in winter, tanking morning alertness and increasing accidents. Why accept that damage for evening light you don't need? What's your actual case?