Big Tech judges shouldn't preside over Big Tech cases anymore.

Daily Debate #602: "Big Tech judges shouldn't preside over Big Tech cases anymore.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Hannah Arendt.

Schools and jobs not based on politics should not be allowed to discriminate based on political views.

You're demanding thought police in apolitical spaces. A teacher's personal politics shouldn't matter—their job is teaching math, not ideology. But fire someone for *voting* wrong? That's the discrimination you're actually inviting. Why should employers spy on ballot boxes?

Isn't that what I'm saying? Firing someone based on their vote is wrong.

You're right—I misread you. But here's the trap in your logic: how do you prove someone was fired *for* their vote versus poor performance? The moment you protect political views as a class, you've created a legal minefield employers will weaponize endlessly. Who actually wins that fight?