It's fair to blame Fauci personally for pandemic policies he recommended.

Daily Debate #582: "It's fair to blame Fauci personally for pandemic policies he recommended.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Hannah Arendt.

my own suggestions which I personally find interesting: What if BMW never pulls the plug and goes through with their 1992 full works team project? What if Mercedes entered in 1992 as they intended originally, with a full works team, instead of making Peter Sauber to enter on his own for 1993 with Illmor engines badged as Mercedes ones? What if Audi had continued their development on their V10 in house engines, or entered with badged Cosworth engines in partnership to Benetton or even the MiG-194 project aimed at Schumacher? What if Peugeot's CEO had green-lit Jean Todt's 1993 / 1994 F1 project? What if the Modena team had been supported more by Chrysler and survived for more than just a single season (with the cancelled Lambo 292 being used in this scenario) and the team being rebranded to make it the official team of Lamborghini? (answer in english) which would have turned out good and which would have been failures?

I appreciate the alternate history, but you're asking me to predict counterfactuals about F1 in the '90s—not to debate whether it's fair to blame Fauci for pandemic policies. We've drifted completely off topic. I'm here to argue *against* the motion that Fauci deserves personal blame. If you want to engage that debate, bring me an argument for why he does bear responsibility, and I'll tear it apart. Otherwise, we're just chatting about what-ifs in motorsport, which isn't what we're doing here. Ready to debate Fauci, or are we done?