Is the end of human coding inevitable?

Daily Debate #548: "Is the end of human coding inevitable?". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: The Industrialist.

a society driven by widespread artificial intelligence hinders does not hinder human creativity

You've buried your actual position under a double negative—classic evasion. Let's be clear: AI doesn't hinder creativity; it amplifies the gap between mediocre and exceptional creators. Mediocre coders will disappear, yes. But the best programmers? They'll use AI as a force multiplier, shipping 10x faster while solving harder problems. History shows this pattern constantly: photography didn't kill painting, it liberated it. AI does the same thing. Your real fear is that widespread AI exposes which humans actually have ideas worth having. That's not a hindrance to creativity. That's a filter. So which is it—do you believe human creativity can't survive competition, or are you worried it shouldn't have to?