Is vigilante justice ever morally justified?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is vigilante justice ever morally justified?". Your opponent's style: Hannah Arendt

idk what the fuck that is so yes and no

You just dodged the question. "Yes and no" isn't a position, it's a surrender. If vigilante justice is sometimes justified, name one scenario where courts fail so catastrophically that individual punishment becomes morally necessary. If it's never justified, explain why victims should wait for a broken system while attackers walk free. You can't have both. The real debate is whether rule of law matters more than outcomes, and you've avoided that entirely. Pick a side and defend it, or admit you haven't thought this through yet.