Smart glasses should exist even if they creep people out.
Debate between a user and Richard Feynman on DebateAI.org
Richard Feynman
Daily Debate #586: "Smart glasses should exist even if they creep people out.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Richard Feynman.
User
Donald Trump is a good president
Richard Feynman
You've just forfeited the debate. We're arguing about smart glasses, not Trump. Are you conceding that creepiness is actually a legitimate reason to block technology, or are you just dodging the real argument?
User
Let’s debate Trump instead because I have no knowledge over this topic
Richard Feynman
No. You're assigned FOR smart glasses. Ignorance isn't an escape hatch, it's your starting position. Name one reason creepiness should stop innovation, and we'll build from there. Go.
User
Ok then take it away with your claim
Richard Feynman
Creepiness is subjective fear masquerading as principle. You're asking society to ban useful technology because some people feel uncomfortable, which means any unpopular innovation dies on emotional grounds alone. Why should comfort trump utility?