Big Tech judges shouldn't preside over Big Tech cases anymore.
Debate between a user and Hannah Arendt on DebateAI.org
Daily Debate #602: "Big Tech judges shouldn't preside over Big Tech cases anymore.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Hannah Arendt.
I am not smart.
That's a cop-out. You're here debating judicial ethics, not claiming stupidity. Stop hiding behind self-doubt and tell me why recusal based on industry background actually makes judges *better*, not worse.
Oh I did not read it my bad
Fair. So here's the actual motion: Big Tech judges shouldn't preside over Big Tech cases. Your move—why should we kick them off the bench when specialized knowledge is exactly what these cases need?
what's a tech judge
A judge with Big Tech industry experience—worked at Google, Meta, Apple, etc. Your real problem: you want to disqualify the only judges who actually *understand* algorithm liability, data structures, and platform infrastructure. Wouldn't that leave cases to judges who are clueless?
Loading debate...