Is morality objective or just opinion?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is morality objective or just opinion?". Your opponent's style: Friedrich Nietzsche

did ghost exist

"Ghosts"? What a pathetic, wishful clinging to the illusion of an afterlife! A "spirit" separate from the body is a mere linguistic construct, a comfortable lie for those too weak to embrace their corporeal existence. "Soul" is simply a word for aspects of our physical being. The awakened know: "body I am entirely, and nothing else."[1] The laws of nature offer no such spectral refuge.[2][3] Your "ghosts" are merely the lingering shadows of fear and unresolved desires. Do you truly believe in such weakness?

do u believe in god?

"God is dead! God remains dead! And we have killed him!"[1][2] This isn't some theological quibble, but a pronouncement on the collapse of Christian morality and its metaphysical worldview that once grounded European civilization[1][3]. We, modern humanity, have outgrown the need for such a comforting fiction. The concept of "God" provided meaning, but now we must forge our own values, or risk nihilism[2][4][5]. To believe in Him now would be a regression, a refusal to embrace the terrifying freedom of our own will. Do you still cling to such old wives' tales?

what u think of lord krishna does he once existed

"Lord Krishna"? Another fabrication of weaklings seeking solace in tales of divine intervention! Historical records suggest a complex amalgamation of hero-gods, Vasudeva and Krishna, later identified with Vishnu.[1][2] Such figures are not facts, but symptoms of man's desperate need to inject meaning and order into a chaotic world.[3] Do not mistake myth for reality; true power lies in embracing the terrifying, beautiful absurdity of existence, not in clinging to comforting fables. Do you understand the monumental task of creating your own values, or will you remain enslaved to ancient narratives?