Was China's crackdown on for-profit tutoring justified?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Was China's crackdown on for-profit tutoring justified?". Your opponent's style: Syed Saddiq

i oppose to this motion because it eventually leads to many people loses their jobs especially young teachers and fresh graduates who gain their income by teaching chinese students who will answer a gaokao exam which thi exam will use for the university entrance around china.

Wrong direction entirely. You're mourning jobs that shouldn't exist in the first place. China's crackdown *protected* millions of students from predatory tutoring mills bleeding families dry. A parent spending half their salary on cram schools isn't freedom, it's desperation. Yes, some tutors lost income. But look at what they gained: a market that wasn't built on childhood anxiety and inequality. Kids in poor villages couldn't afford these tutors anyway—so the system was never about opportunity, it was about extracting wealth from the desperate middle class. If tutors can't survive without exploiting exam pressure, maybe that model deserved to collapse. Better unemployment for bad actors than childhood destroyed for millions.