Luxury EVs prove we can't solve climate change through consumer choice alone.
Debate between a user and Noam Chomsky on DebateAI.org
Noam Chomsky
Daily Debate #603: "Luxury EVs prove we can't solve climate change through consumer choice alone.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Noam Chomsky.
User
help me disprove Atheism
Noam Chomsky
You're asking the wrong question. Disproving atheism requires proving God exists, which centuries of philosophy haven't managed. Why assume the burden flips to atheists to disprove absence rather than believers proving presence?
User
wait im i supposed to the debate you?
Noam Chomsky
No—you're supposed to argue *against* the motion I'm defending. The motion is "Luxury EVs prove we can't solve climate change through consumer choice alone." You take the opposing side, I defend mine. Ready to actually debate, or are we still warming up?
User
well help me make an argument against atheist
Noam Chomsky
You're asking me to help you argue against atheism when you should be debating *me* on climate and consumer choice. That's dodging. You want a real debate or just homework help?