Your parents should have access to your location 24/7

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Your parents should have access to your location 24/7". Your opponent's style: Edward Snowden

Donald trump is the best president in the history of the united states.

You're leading with a sweeping historical claim instead of a real argument. "Best" requires a metric, and you've named none. By what standard? Economic growth? Trump inherited a recovery from 2009-2016. Job creation? The pandemic destroyed 22 million jobs on his watch. Judicial appointments? That's one dimension, not "best overall." You're confusing personal preference with historical fact. Every president has tradeoffs. Lincoln preserved the union but suspended habeas corpus. FDR ended the Depression but interned Japanese Americans. Trump cut taxes and appointed conservatives, then lost the popular vote twice and faced impeachment twice. That's not a presidential resume, that's a mixed record. What specific achievement actually makes him objectively superior to Washington, Jefferson, or FDR?

Economic growth has been pretty good, our inflation is down to about 2% from 7% under joe biden. Job creation is another stength of his, the latest job growth numbers far exceeded expectations. Also he won the popular vote last election, so you are incorrect when youbsay he lost the popular vote twice. Also, how did those impeachments work out? They not only failed the actual litmus test of wrong doing which would be removal from office, but Trump subsequently won a second nok consecutive term after those impeachments. This was a clear rebuke of those imoeachments. There are many metrics by which my claim is substantiated.

You're conflating recent conditions with Trump's personal achievement. Inflation dropped because the Federal Reserve raised rates aggressively starting under Biden, not because of Trump's policies. Those job numbers? They're partly a rebound from pandemic losses and labor market tightness. You're right, I was wrong on the popular vote in 2024, fair correction. But impeachment failures don't validate a presidency, they just mean Senate Republicans blocked removal. Electoral victory after impeachment proves voters forgave it, not that the charges were baseless. You're still naming policy outcomes, not why Trump ranks above every president ever. Better economy than Lincoln? Better unity than Washington? You're measuring a single term against 240 years. That's not "best in history," that's "best recently."

The job numbers arent just rebounding, they have greatly exceeded expectations from experts by nearly double the anticipated growth. That is both Trumps personal success and current conditions. The two go hand in hand. I didnt say impeachment failures validate his presidency, but i did refute your contention that the impeachments were relevant to his legacy if he subsequently won the popular vote. Naming policy outcomes is the evidence for why he is the best president ever. What would be better logical metric with which to measure a presidents success if not the outcomes and resuls of his policies? Im also not using a single term in 240 years as he basis of my argument. Im using two terms. Two non consecutive terms which has only haopened one other time. You use broad and inaccurate statements such as "best recently" when in reality there are several historic successes of Trumps which are outliers in American history. Not just "recently".

You're conflating correlation with causation. Job growth exceeding forecasts doesn't prove Trump caused it, only that conditions were favorable. Economic policy takes years to materialize, not months. On metrics: outcomes matter, but so does context. FDR pulled America out of Depression and won World War II. Lincoln preserved the nation itself. Trump cut taxes and appointed judges while inflation fell and jobs grew—all measurable, none historically singular. Two non-consecutive terms is rare, sure. But rarity isn't greatness. You're still avoiding the hard question: what specific Trump outcome surpasses saving the Union or defeating fascism? "Several historic successes" remains vague. Name one that ranks above existential preservation of the country itself.

"Economoic policy takes months not years" is another one of your broad and over simplistic dismissals of Trumps success. It might have taken that long previously because of bad policy. As you requested, i will name the historical success that ranks above the existential preservation of the country. It is also the existential preservation of our country by limiting illegal immigration to practically 0 illegal entries in 2025. He successfully stopped the invasion of millions of foreign migrants that had been entering into this country during the Biden administration.

You're inventing a crisis to match a solution. "Practically zero illegal entries" is false. Apprehensions at the southern border remain substantial in 2025, not near zero. Even if enforcement tightened dramatically, calling immigration an "existential" threat equivalent to Civil War or Nazi Germany is catastrophizing. Lincoln faced literal military secession. FDR faced actual genocide abroad. Trump faces a policy disagreement about border management. Those aren't equivalent threats. You've also shifted your claim entirely. You started with "best president ever" based on economic outcomes. Now you're arguing immigration policy is an existential achievement rivaling national survival. That's moving goalposts, not building a stronger argument. Which is it—economics or immigration?

I said illegal entries not apprehensions. You are conflating the two. Illegal entries are 0.

That's a distinction without difference. You can't know actual illegal entries—they're by definition undetected. Apprehensions are the only measurable data we have. Claiming zero entries is unfalsifiable rhetoric, not evidence. Even Trump's own agencies report illegal crossings, not zero. You're now abandoning empirical argument for assertion. More importantly, you've still dodged the core issue: stopping illegal immigration, however successfully, doesn't rank as "existential preservation" comparable to Civil War or WWII. Policy success isn't historical greatness. Every president has wins. Your original claim was "best president ever." You've proven he had good policies and electoral success. That's not the same thing. Why should recent competence matter more than literally saving the nation's existence?