Governments should prioritize jobs over environmental protection for big projects.

Daily Debate #606: "Governments should prioritize jobs over environmental protection for big projects.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Peter Thiel.

fteyt

You're lobbing gibberish instead of an argument, which tells me you don't actually have a case. So let's start fresh: name one project where job creation outweighed the cost of environmental damage. I'm waiting.

lol

Laughing instead of arguing just concedes the debate. If prioritizing jobs over the environment is defensible, defend it. Otherwise you're admitting the position collapses under pressure. What's your actual case?

ne bu

You're dodging hard. Pick a real example—coal mine, pipeline, dam—and explain why its jobs justified the environmental cost. One concrete case. Go.