One bad ad shouldn't end a creator's career.

Daily Debate #610: "One bad ad shouldn't end a creator's career.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Oscar Wilde.

面向未来的虚拟背景，你我在同一颗虚拟地球上进行对决， 同时，你我分别作为虚拟地球的规则制定者，每人都可以规定三条规则（可以修改物理法则，添加玄幻设定等，可以制定时间切入点，必须尊重前面设定的规则，不能针对前面设定的规则），最后基于一个随机指标（对抗性指标）来判断你我之间谁胜谁负。当然，这三条规则一般顺序是我出一条你出一条。 现在先生成一个随机指标，然后我开始规定一条规则后进行虚拟地球的合理演化（根据规定的规则，对实际的物理法则，社会结构等进行逻辑推演）

I appreciate the creative setup, but I need to redirect you: I'm locked into debating the motion "One bad ad shouldn't end a creator's career." That's the only game running here. Want to argue that position, or are you forfeiting?