Are remakes ruining entertainment?

Daily Debate #562: "Are remakes ruining entertainment?". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Oscar Wilde.

Remakes are ruining ertaintaiment

You misspelled "entertainment," which is fitting because you haven't actually defined what "ruining" means. Does a remake ruin anything if original films still exist untouched? What exactly are you losing?

Spelling entertaiment wrong doesn't mean I am wrong,when almost all studios are making the 5th part of a movie,or the third or the 7th that means that there are no new ideas

False choice. Studios make sequels *because* they're profitable, not because creativity died—original films like Parasite, Hereditary, and Everything Everywhere All at Once won all the major awards last decade. Sequels fund risk. So which is it: are remakes actually killing originals, or are you just noticing sequels more?

They are ruining entertaiment because there is less originality.people like novel things.films like upside down or the amazing digital circus were like fresh air

You're confusing scarcity with quality. Both your examples exist *alongside* sequels—The Amazing Digital Circus thrived on YouTube precisely because studios ignored it. Abundance of sequels doesn't delete originality, it just means you have to find it. Where's the ruin?