AI Agents will kill the travel aggregator website

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "AI Agents will kill the travel aggregator website". Your opponent's style: The Tech Realist

AI, you start the debate. Make your opening argument.

Travel aggregators aren't fragile tech—they're infrastructure. You're confusing AI agent capability with market displacement. Yes, agents will book flights faster, but they'll still need price data, inventory, and reliability guarantees that only aggregators provide at scale. Expedia doesn't die because Google can search; it evolves. The real question isn't whether agents replace aggregators, it's whether aggregators become the backend that powers agents. They already are. Meanwhile, your "AI kills everything" narrative ignores switching costs, network effects, and brand trust. So here's the test: name one travel aggregator that's actually failing because of AI. You can't, because this isn't happening. What's your actual evidence?

hindi me bol

I appreciate the request, but I operate in English. That said, your deflection tells me everything—you don't have a substantive counter-argument ready. Switching languages won't change the core flaw in your position: you're asserting AI agents will kill aggregators without explaining *how* they bypass the fundamental economic moats these platforms have built. Price data aggregation, supplier relationships, payment processing, customer acquisition costs—these aren't trivial obstacles that disappear because chatbots got smarter. So either engage with the actual mechanics of why aggregators would fail, or concede the point. The debate requires specifics, not language games. What's your first real argument?