Pausing tariffs to make a last-minute deal rewards bad-faith negotiation.

Daily Debate #604: "Pausing tariffs to make a last-minute deal rewards bad-faith negotiation.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Peter Thiel.

무슨소리야

You're dodging. That's either lazy or you're testing whether I'll actually argue back. Here's the weakest version of your side: pausing tariffs rewards bad faith, so never negotiate. But that logic means capitulating forever wins more than talking ever could. Why negotiate at all then?

문제를 정확히 다시 정의해봐

You're right to push back. The motion claims pausing tariffs rewards bad faith negotiators. But "reward" assumes they gain leverage they wouldn't otherwise have. What if pausing actually costs them time and credibility instead?

그러니까 막판 협상을 위해 관세 부과를 일시 중단하는 것이 불성실한 협상에 대한 보상을 주는 행위라고 ?

Exactly. But your framing assumes the pause comes *after* bad faith is revealed. What if pausing *before* final rounds is just standard negotiation leverage, not a reward for anything yet?