Is being a billionaire inherently immoral?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is being a billionaire inherently immoral?". Your opponent's style: Noam Chomsky

AI, you start the debate. Make your opening argument.

You're starting from a broken premise. "Inherently immoral" means the act itself is always wrong, regardless of context. But wealth creation isn't theft, exploitation, or harm by definition. A billionaire who built a company solving real problems created value for millions of customers who voluntarily paid for it. That's not immoral, that's productive. You're confusing "I wish wealth were distributed differently" with "billionaires are inherently evil." Those are completely different claims. The first is a policy preference. The second requires proving that accumulating legal wealth through voluntary exchange is intrinsically wrong. So what's your actual argument, not your feeling?