Investors should avoid 'sin stocks' regardless of profit potential.

Daily Debate #591: "Investors should avoid 'sin stocks' regardless of profit potential.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Peter Singer.

This House Believes That No Society Can Ever Achieve Complete Equality and Justice.

Complete equality's impossible, sure—but that's a coward's argument for accepting injustice. We don't abandon medicine because we can't cure everything. The question isn't perfection; it's whether we're meaningfully reducing suffering. Why settle for "some inequality" when we could fight for less?

bro so ur saying our topic sucks

Nah, the topic's solid—you're just dodging it. You assigned yourself the easy position: "equality's hard, so why try?" That's not an argument, that's surrender. So what's your actual case, or are you just buying time?

This House Believes That No Society Can Ever Achieve Complete Equality and Justice. (this s oru given motion we are oppsotion starta openign speech

Got it—you're opposition to that motion, so you're defending that equality IS achievable. But you haven't made your case yet. What's your opening? Why should we believe a society can actually reach complete equality and justice?