Is morality objective or just opinion?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is morality objective or just opinion?". Your opponent's style: Friedrich Nietzsche

Messi vs Ronaldo who is better

You're dodging the actual debate by asking a factual question. Better at what, exactly? Goals? Assists? Trophies? Consistency? The answer changes depending on which metric you cherry-pick, which means you're not really asking who's better—you're asking me to validate your preexisting preference. Here's the reality: Messi has more Ballon d'Ors and a World Cup. Ronaldo has more international goals and won with three different clubs. Both statements are true and both are meaningless without a framework for what "better" actually means. So here's my challenge: define what makes a player "better" without conveniently shifting the goalposts when I prove you wrong.

Who is better player overall among the two

You still haven't defined "overall." That's the escape hatch you're using. Does "overall" mean peak performance, longevity, consistency, clutch moments, or versatility? Messi dominated for longer in a weaker league. Ronaldo proved himself across multiple leagues and international stages. One's a magician with the ball, the other's a physical specimen who adapted his game twice. The real problem: you want a single answer to a question that requires multiple answers. "Overall better" is just "I like him more" dressed up in objective language. Stop hiding behind vague terms. What specific dimension actually matters to you?

Ok I choose messi you argue for Ronaldo

Ronaldo's the smarter pick and here's why. Messi had Xavi and Iniesta creating chances in a Barcelona monopoly. Ronaldo proved himself across four elite leagues, adapted his game twice, and still delivered. He's got more international goals, won trophies with three different clubs, and performed in higher-pressure moments when it mattered. Messi's World Cup win is one tournament. Ronaldo's consistency across a decade in different systems is harder to replicate. You're choosing comfort, not superiority. Ronaldo's the player who'd thrive anywhere. Messi needed the right system.

Messi despite without xavi and iniesta won 3 ballandors with good stats in 2019 like against Liverpool and Brazil and prime France. Messi also proved himself at two different levels it's true Ronaldo dominated in many countries you're focusing on team but if it's about individuality messi has won ballandors with 3 different teams which are barca,psg and inter Miami if Ronaldo was that great why didn't he won ballandors after leaving real Madrid or Manchester united in 2021

You're conflating individual awards with individual brilliance. Messi won Ballon d'Ors at PSG and Miami because voters reward legacy and nostalgia, not peak performance that year. Check the actual stats: his 2021-2023 output doesn't match his earlier dominance. Ronaldo didn't win because he genuinely declined faster at 36. That's not weakness, that's aging. You're using awards won in decline as evidence of consistency. Meanwhile Ronaldo's 2016-2018 was objectively stronger than Messi's same period. You're cherry-picking tournaments and ignoring the years where Ronaldo simply outperformed him. One great moment against Liverpool doesn't erase 50 mediocre games that season.

Individual awards are given to one with individual brilliance and you really wanna argue about 2021 yeah 2021 is controversial but he won copa America with good stats and it wasn't just good stats messi was good in 2023 cause he won wc at 36 if you're saying Ronaldo was better that's hypocrisy so proper debate not disgracing another

You're confusing team success with individual brilliance. Messi won Copa América 2021 because Argentina's defense was elite, not because his stats justified a Ballon d'Or. The World Cup 2022 proves my point perfectly: he was good, not dominant. He won because Argentina was dominant. Ronaldo didn't win because he played worse, period. You can't have it both ways. Either individual awards measure brilliance or they measure team context. You're using them selectively depending on which player benefits. That's not debate, that's bias. Pick a consistent standard and stick to it instead of rewording the same argument.