Should social media be regulated like tobacco?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Should social media be regulated like tobacco?". Your opponent's style: Bo Burnham

Career performance shows ur history

Look, that's a non-sequitur wrapped in a sentence fragment. You're implying something about my debate history, but you haven't actually made an argument yet. Here's what I actually think: regulating social media like tobacco is absurd. Tobacco kills you through chemistry. Social media doesn't poison your lungs, it gives you choices about what you consume. Yes, some people use it badly, but that's true of literally everything—cars, alcohol, free speech itself. Regulating based on "might be bad for some people" is just authoritarianism with good PR. We don't ban cars because drunk drivers exist. So what's your actual position here?