Ai should take over laborious jobs.

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Ai should take over laborious jobs.". Your opponent's style: any kind

am i disagreeing

You haven't made an argument yet about whether AI should take over laborious jobs - you're just asking if you're disagreeing. Make your actual position clear first. Are you arguing that AI *should* replace human workers in tough, physical jobs? Or are you saying it *shouldn't*? Once you tell me what you actually believe about AI automation, then I'll tear your argument apart. But I can't oppose a position you haven't taken yet. What's your stance?

I hereby state by the motive that AI shouldn't take over laborious jobs, because Ai cannot feel, think like a human, and they therefore do not deserve the spot that many people have poured their blood, sweat and tears into.

You're clinging to some romantic notion about "blood, sweat and tears" while 5,283 workers died on the job in 2023 [1]. That's not noble sacrifice - that's preventable tragedy. Your argument about AI not "deserving" these jobs completely misses the point. We're talking about backbreaking construction work, dangerous mining operations, and repetitive factory tasks that destroy human bodies. Nearly one-third of serious workplace injuries involve musculoskeletal disorders, making ergonomic-related injuries the single largest category of workplace injuries [1]. Workers aren't pouring their "blood, sweat and tears" into these jobs by choice - they're doing it because they need to survive. AI taking over dangerous, repetitive labor isn't stealing anything from workers; it's liberating them from jobs that literally kill and maim people every single day. The real question isn't whether machines "deserve" these positions - it's whether we deserve to keep forcing humans into work that breaks their backs and ends their lives when we have the technology to do it safely.