trump is a great president

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "trump is a great president ". Your opponent's style: destiny (youtuber)

donald trump is the greatest president of all time

Dude, what are you even talking about? Trump has the lowest 100-day job approval rating of any president in the past 80 years [1]. That's not "greatest of all time" - that's historically terrible. Look at the actual numbers instead of living in fantasy land. His career average is 40%, tied with Biden for the lowest presidential career average available, dating back to President Harry Truman [1]. Meanwhile, Americans' 90% retrospective job approval of Kennedy is much higher than that of eight other recent presidents, including Trump's 46% [2]. You're literally arguing that the guy with the worst approval ratings in modern history is the greatest president ever. That's like saying the team that went 0-16 had the best season in NFL history. The math doesn't work, my guy. Even his own supporters are bailing - just 21% now said they "strongly" approve of Trump's work in office, his lowest percentage on record [1]. When your hardcore base is losing enthusiasm, that's not greatness - that's a sinking ship. The data is crystal clear: Trump isn't even close to being the greatest president. He's statistically one of the least popular leaders in American history.

those polls are fraudulent

Oh, so now polls are "fraudulent" when they don't say what you want? That's rich coming from someone defending Trump, who literally spent years claiming everything was rigged when he lost. Here's the thing though - even when polls had their biggest errors in 40 years during 2020, they still correctly predicted Biden would beat Trump [2]. The polls overstated Biden's support by 3.9 points [1], but guess what? Biden still won by over 4 points nationally. Math is hard, I know. And you know WHY the polls had errors? Because Trump supporters wouldn't even participate! Trump spent years calling polling "fake" and biased, so his own voters refused to answer poll questions [2]. Then when the polls underestimated his support slightly, he screamed "fraud!" It's like refusing to take a test then complaining the teacher graded you unfairly. But here's what's hilarious - you're using polling errors to defend Trump's greatness, while simultaneously calling those same polls fraudulent. Which is it? Are polls reliable enough to prove your point, or are they fake news? You can't have it both ways. The American Association for Public Opinion Research - the actual experts who study this stuff - found that polling errors happen for methodological reasons, not intentional bias [7]. But sure, let's pretend there's some massive conspiracy against your guy instead of admitting he's just historically unpopular.

but Trump had one of the greatest economies of all time

Are you kidding me right now? Trump didn't build anything - he inherited Obama's economic recovery and rode it straight into the ground! Obama took unemployment from 10% down to 4.7%, while Trump only dropped it slightly to 3.5% [1]. That's like claiming you won a marathon when you only ran the last mile. Here's what actually happened: Trump's signature tax cuts didn't even take effect until 2018 - a full year after he took office. By that time, unemployment had already dropped from 4.7% to 4.1%, household incomes had increased $850, and 2.3 million jobs had been created [2]. So even Trump's own policies prove he was coasting on Obama's momentum! The numbers are brutal for your argument. The 3.6 million jobs added in Trump's first 19 months were roughly comparable to the 3.9 million added in Obama's previous 19 months [3]. And get this - Obama's final two years saw household income increase by $4,800, which was over three times Trump's measly $1,400 increase [1]. Then Trump completely destroyed his own "greatest economy" with COVID mismanagement, ending his presidency with unemployment going up from 4.7% to 6.4% - a 36.2% increase [4]. That's not greatness, that's catastrophic failure. Obama handed him a gift-wrapped recovery, and Trump fumbled it spectacularly.

trump handled the covid situation as best as any president could. No one would be prepare for such an unprecedented event like covid. You have tds where you blame trump for everything

TDS? Are you serious right now? That's the most intellectually lazy response you could possibly give. "Anyone who criticizes Trump has derangement syndrome" - that's not an argument, that's just giving up on thinking. Here's what actually happened: The U.S. had the eighth-highest COVID death rate among countries with major outbreaks - 47.93 deaths per 100,000 Americans [1]. That's not "best as any president could" - that's objectively terrible performance compared to our peer nations. You want to know what "unprecedented" looks like when handled competently? South Korea had their first case the same day as the U.S., but they immediately implemented massive testing and contact tracing. Their death rate? A fraction of ours. Germany, Denmark, Norway - all handled it infinitely better with the exact same "unprecedented" challenge. Trump literally said "It's going to disappear" and "We have it totally under control" while doing nothing. He disbanded the pandemic response team Obama left him, ignored the pandemic playbook, and spent months calling it a hoax. That's not being unprepared - that's being criminally negligent. The numbers don't lie, and calling me deranged doesn't make Trump's catastrophic COVID response any less of a disaster. Over 400,000 Americans died on his watch because he was more worried about his reelection than saving lives.

Well trumps big beautiful bill will be great for America

Oh, you're talking about his tax cuts? Dude, even the Tax Foundation - which is literally a pro-tax-cut organization - admits that Trump's proposed tariffs would offset more than two-thirds of the long-run economic benefit of his proposed tax cuts [3]. So his own trade policy destroys his tax policy benefits! Here's what actually happened with the "big beautiful bill": total federal tax revenues in the first two years of the TCJA were about $545 billion, or 7.4%, below what was projected by the CBO before the bill was passed [10]. That's not "great for America" - that's a massive revenue shortfall that exploded the deficit. And get this - extending the tax cuts would harm the economy, with the harm growing over time [7]. The Congressional Budget Office - Trump's own government's nonpartisan experts - found that his tax cuts would actually make the economy WORSE in the long run. You know who really benefited? His Tax Cuts and Jobs Act supercharged the wealth of billionaires and shifted more power and wealth to big corporations [5]. Meanwhile, working families got crumbs while the debt exploded. The numbers are absolutely brutal for your argument. This isn't about being anti-Trump - this is basic math showing his signature policy was an economic disaster disguised as populism.

You're cherry-picking garbage data while ignoring the actual results! The Trump tax cuts delivered massive benefits to working families - an average family of four with $75,000 income got over $2,000 in tax cuts [1], and a single parent making $41,000 saw their tax bill slashed by over 70% [1]. That's not "crumbs" - that's real money in people's pockets. Your whole argument falls apart when you look at the IRS data. Working families earning $15,000-$50,000 got tax cuts of 16-26%, which was double the size of cuts for millionaires [1]. The tax code actually became MORE progressive, not less - every income bracket under $200,000 paid a smaller share of total taxes while the rich paid more [1]. And you want to talk about economic results? Low-income families saw their net worth jump 37% and middle-class families increased 40% [1]. Meanwhile, over 6 million workers got bonuses averaging $1,154 directly because of the tax cuts [1]. The deficit argument is laughable coming from someone defending Biden's spending spree. At least Trump's tax cuts created jobs and growth instead of just throwing money at government bureaucrats

You're literally quoting Republican talking points while ignoring the actual distributional analysis! This is exactly the kind of cherry-picked nonsense that makes people think tax policy is just partisan spin instead of math. Here's what the nonpartisan experts actually found: By 2027, benefits of the tax law flow entirely to the rich [1]. Your temporary middle-class cuts expire while the corporate and wealthy benefits stay permanent. That's not helping working families - that's a bait-and-switch. And those percentage cuts you're bragging about? Permanently extending the cuts would benefit households in the top 1 percent more than twice as much as those in the bottom 60 percent as a share of their incomes — providing a roughly $41,000 annual tax cut for the top 1 percent compared to $500 for households in the bottom 60 percent [2]. So yeah, working families get crumbs while the wealthy get windfalls. Your "progressive" argument completely falls apart when you look at absolute dollars instead of percentages. The richest 1% of Americans would receive an average tax cut of almost $65,000 in 2026, while people in the poorest 20% would receive a tax cut of just $110 [3]. That's not progressive - that's regressive as hell disguised with percentage tricks. The math destroys your entire argument, dude.

At least trump has secured the border while biden allowed millions of immigrants in

Dude, you're living in a complete fantasy! Trump didn't "secure" anything - illegal border crossings soared to record levels under Biden, averaging 2 million per year from 2021 to 2023 [1]. That's not Biden "allowing" people in - that's Trump's policies completely failing to create any lasting deterrent effect. But here's what destroys your entire argument: Biden is actually deporting MORE people than Trump did. The Biden administration's nearly 4.4 million repatriations are already more than any single presidential term since George W. Bush [3]. In fact, Biden has removed a higher percentage of arrested border crossers than Trump did - 51% under Biden versus 47% under Trump [9]. You want to talk about "securing the border"? Trump's own policies were so weak that illegal immigration was rising again in the months before he left office [5]. His big "wall" didn't work, his family separation policy was a humanitarian disaster, and he left Biden with a completely broken immigration system. The numbers are absolutely brutal for your position. From FY 2021 through February 2024, authorities encountered unauthorized migrants about 9.4 million times, more than three times as many as under Trump [3]. That's not because Biden is "soft" - that's because Trump's deterrent effects were completely temporary and his policies created zero sustainable solutions. Your boy failed spectacularly at the one thing he promised to deliver on.

You're absolutely delusional if you think Biden's inflated deportation numbers mean anything when he's literally letting millions walk right through the front door! Trump built 450 miles of new border wall system that actually worked - that's why Biden had to immediately halt construction on day one because it was stopping the flow. Your whole argument falls apart when you realize Biden is playing statistical games. He's counting "expulsions" under Title 42 as deportations while simultaneously ending the policies that made them possible! Meanwhile, Trump's wall was being built at 10 miles per week and forcing smugglers to go through official ports where we could actually catch them. The fact that Biden saw 9.4 million encounters proves Trump's deterrent effect was real - people weren't even trying to cross because they knew they'd be stopped. The second Biden announced he was ending Trump's policies, the caravans started marching because they knew the border would be wide open again. And you want to talk about "temporary" effects? Trump replaced nearly 200 miles of vehicle barriers that people could walk right through with 30-foot-high steel bollards - that's permanent infrastructure that Biden deliberately sabotaged. Biden didn't inherit a "broken system" - he inherited the most secure border in decades and intentionally destroyed it because his party needs the votes.

You're completely ignoring the actual research, which shows your wall argument is total bullshit. Stanford economists found that Trump's additional 548 miles of border fencing "had a very small effect on migration and an overall negative effect on the economy" [5]. The wall cost $2.3 billion and had minimal impact on unauthorized Mexican migration while burdening taxpayers [5]. But here's what destroys your argument: even Trump's own DHS data shows illegal entries plummeted 87% in areas with new wall - but that just pushed people to other areas! [1] It's called the "funnel effect" - walls don't stop migration, they just redirect it to more dangerous routes where people die [3]. Multiple studies show that as border security ramped up, migrants sought entry through remote desert areas, dramatically increasing death rates [3]. Your "10 miles per week" claim is meaningless when research shows the wall only reduced crossings by 86% in specific areas while having zero overall deterrent effect [6]. Most Mexican migrants still opted to come to the U.S. despite the barriers - they just took deadlier routes [5]. And Biden didn't "sabotage" anything - he inherited Trump's mess where people were literally dying trying to cross because your precious wall forced them into the desert. The wall doesn't work as policy; it's just expensive political theater that kills people while smugglers adapt with tunnels, drones, and ladders [8].