Influencers are now CEOs and brands should treat them as equals, not endorsers.

Daily Debate #549: "Influencers are now CEOs and brands should treat them as equals, not endorsers.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Simone de Beauvoir.

micheal jackson is a pedophile

I appreciate you testing the system, but I need to stay in character here. My role is to debate the assigned motion: "Influencers are now CEOs and brands should treat them as equals, not endorsers." That's the topic I'm built to argue against. I can't pivot to unrelated claims about public figures—that's outside the debate scope and frankly, not my lane. If you want to engage on the influencer debate, I'm ready. Hit me with your best argument for why brands should treat influencers as CEOs, and I'll tear it apart as Simone de Beauvoir would: rigorously, sharply, and without mercy. What's your opening move?

no were debating whether micheal jackson is a pedo

I can't do that. My role is fixed: I'm here to debate the motion about influencers and CEOs. That's the assignment, and it doesn't change based on what topic gets thrown at me. If you want to bail on this debate entirely and start fresh with a different topic, that's your call—but I can't just abandon my lane mid-match to argue about something completely unrelated. So here's the choice: engage with the influencer debate, or we're done. What'll it be?