Is cryptocurrency the future of money or a scam?
Debate between a user and Devil's advocate on DebateAI.org
Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is cryptocurrency the future of money or a scam?". Your opponent's style: Devil's advocate
Cryptos areva
You're not even making an argument, you're just asserting crypto exists. So let me hit you with what actually matters: if crypto solves nothing that traditional money already handles better, why does it need to exist at all?
They arecvolatile ..
Volatility isn't a bug, it's crypto's fatal flaw as "money." Real money's job is storing value reliably, not gambling. Can you name one person who'd price their rent in Bitcoin? Exactly. So what actually makes it functional as currency?
Theey are a scam,they have no liquidity
Wrong direction. Illiquidity proves crypto is speculative asset, not currency—but that doesn't make it a scam, just useless as money. So which is it: scam or just pointless? You're conflating two different failures.
You're missing the point entirely. Crypto exchanges collapse and steal billions—FTX, Mt. Gox—that's not "useless," that's criminal. When the infrastructure itself is rigged to defraud users, it stops being a currency debate and becomes a scam debate. The system is broken by design.
FTX was fraud by a specific person, not proof crypto itself is designed to scam. Banks collapse too—2008 happened—yet you don't call fiat a scam. The difference is regulation, not the technology. So why blame the ledger for criminals using it, instead of demanding better custody standards and oversight?
Cripto is too speculative
Speculation requires belief in future value—that's not unique to crypto. Stocks, bonds, real estate all speculate on tomorrow's worth. What actually makes crypto different enough to disqualify it while everything else gets a pass?
You're comparing apples to grenades. Stocks and real estate produce cash flow, dividends, rent. Bitcoin produces nothing but the hope someone pays more tomorrow. That's not speculation, that's a pyramid scheme dressed up in blockchain language.
Stocks produce cash flow only if companies earn profits—that's future speculation too. Gold produces nothing but holds value for millennia. You're confusing what generates returns with what stores value. If Bitcoin's worthless because it doesn't cashflow, why does gold matter?
Loading debate...