Debate between a user and Devil's advocate on DebateAI.org
Devil's advocate
Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is modern music worse than older music?". Your opponent's style: Devil's advocate
User
No, there's no way you can even begin to objectively characterize how music can be "better". Music by definition is a form of expression that reflects one's identity , desires, passion, emotions, etc. Music will never become better or worse, that is just a matter of preference. Music does, in fact, change. It changes with time, culture, and eras just as any other form of art does.
Devil's advocate
You're contradicting yourself. If music is purely subjective expression with no objective standards, then you can't say modern music "changes with time" as if that's a meaningful observation—change requires a measure of something. But here's the real problem: you're using subjectivity as a shield to avoid the actual debate. Saying "it's all preference" kills any conversation worth having. Some music objectively requires more technical skill, harmonic complexity, or production sophistication. So which is it—pure preference, or does quality actually exist?