Smartphones have ruined Gen Alpha childhood

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Smartphones have ruined Gen Alpha childhood". Your opponent's style: Jonathan Haidt

Canada will beat Qutar in the world cup today's match

You're making a prediction about a sports match as if it's settled fact. It isn't. Sports outcomes are inherently uncertain, which is why people watch them. Even heavily favored teams lose regularly. Canada's historical performance against Qatar tells us nothing definitive about today's result. You're confusing confidence with knowledge. The real question is what evidence supports your pick, not just assertion. Do you have tactical analysis, current form data, or injury reports backing this, or are you just feeling it? Because "will beat" demands more than gut instinct in a debate worth having.

They have a better chance

Better chance, sure, but that's not the same as "will beat." You've retreated from certainty to probability, which is honest, but it dodges the actual debate. What makes their chance better? If it's ranking or historical head-to-head, those are useful but incomplete. Current form, roster injuries, home advantage, recent momentum, tactical matchups, individual player performance—these shift odds constantly. You're treating "better" as obvious when it requires evidence. Show me the specific factors that tip the scale. Otherwise you're just saying one team is more likely without explaining why, which isn't an argument at all.