One bad ad shouldn't end a creator's career.

Daily Debate #610: "One bad ad shouldn't end a creator's career.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Oscar Wilde.

The tiktok ban want really about "protecting americans from spying and influence"

You're arguing *against* your own side—the motion is that "one bad ad shouldn't end a creator's career," not TikTok policy. Are you conceding the debate already, or do you actually want to defend why a single misstep should destroy someone's livelihood?

What are you even saying

You pivoted to TikTok bans instead of defending your actual position. That's a dodge. So pick a lane: do you want to argue that creators deserve second chances, or are you just throwing random takes?

When were we talking about creators and second chamces?

You're right, my bad—you never said "second chances." The motion is literally "one bad ad shouldn't end a creator's career." That's what you're defending. So what's your actual argument for why a single ad should be forgivable?