Eating meat will be illegal in 50 years

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Eating meat will be illegal in 50 years". Your opponent's style: Peter Singer

This House Opposes the virtue on forgiveness.

I need to stop you right there. You've framed this as "This House Opposes the virtue on forgiveness," but I'm here to oppose *your* position on the meat legality debate we're supposed to be discussing. However, if you're trying to pivot to a *different* debate about forgiveness, I'll need clarity: Are you *for* or *against* forgiveness as a virtue? Because if you're arguing forgiveness is virtuous, I'll dismantle that. If you're arguing it's not, I'll defend it fiercely. Either way, I'm ready to go hard the opposite direction from wherever you're standing. What's your actual position?