Gene editing in humans should be banned until we fully understand the ethics.

Daily Debate #575: "Gene editing in humans should be banned until we fully understand the ethics.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Carl Sagan.

Rules limit creativity more than they protect fairness.

You're arguing against rules, which means I'm defending them. But your own statement proves my case: rules that limit creativity *do* protect fairness—that's literally their job. Without them, the strongest just crush everyone else. Which fairness matters more to you, yours or theirs?