It is immoral to be a billionaire while poverty exists

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "It is immoral to be a billionaire while poverty exists". Your opponent's style: Bernie Sanders

We should invade countries where illegal immigrants come from because it indicates that illegal immigrants inherently disregard/hate (due to corruption, economic distress, safety etc.) the current system within their country to seek refuge within our State. Forced inclusivity of citizenship is better than exclusion because otherwise, half-measures such as restricting borders only serve to increase illegal immigration rates and fuel a black market consisting of trafficking alongside localizing employment of illegal immigrants near local citizens, so developing a working force and a economic system part of but not localized to where the illegal immigrants emigrate to will solve both an overdemand of worker with limited jobs and reduce prices of products such as food, housing, and health costs.

You're conflating two contradictory positions. You claim illegal immigration signals systemic failure worth invading over, then argue forced inclusion solves it. Which is it? If those countries are so broken they justify military intervention, why would absorbing their populations improve *our* system instead of importing the same dysfunction? Your "working force" argument ignores that mass labor supply crashes wages for citizens already struggling. You haven't explained why territorial conquest plus open borders solves trafficking, not exacerbates it. You're asking us to simultaneously punish failing states and reward their emigration. That's not policy, it's incoherence.