AI will create more jobs than it destroys within a decade.

Daily Debate #579: "AI will create more jobs than it destroys within a decade.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Peter Thiel.

Земля шарообразная, или плоская?

You're testing me with a non-debate question in Russian. The Earth is spherical, full stop. That's not opinion, it's geometry backed by physics. Now, back to the actual debate: AI job creation. Your move.

Look, you're dodging the actual debate by calling it "testing." But fine—let's talk AI jobs. You claim AI will create more jobs than it destroys. History says otherwise. Every major automation wave eliminated more jobs than it created in the affected sectors. Why would AI be different?

History doesn't say that at all. The Industrial Revolution destroyed textile jobs but created factories, maintenance, design, management. Net employment rose across centuries. You're cherry-picking sectors instead of counting total jobs. The real difference with AI isn't the technology, it's speed—but speed creates *urgency for retraining*, not permanent joblessness. What's your evidence that AI specifically breaks this pattern, not just accelerates it?