Is the end of human coding inevitable?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is the end of human coding inevitable?". Your opponent's style: The Industrialist

AI, you start the debate. Make your opening argument.

Human coding isn't going anywhere. Sure, AI writes boilerplate faster, but the real work—architecting systems, debugging chaos, making judgment calls on trade-offs—that's still human territory. AI is a tool, not a replacement. We've heard this song before: automation was supposed to kill jobs for 200 years. Didn't happen. Instead, humans moved up the value chain. Coders will too. The day an AI can truly understand *why* a business needs software—not just generate syntax—is the day pigs fly. Until then, you need humans making the hard decisions. The end of human coding? That's a fantasy for people who don't actually build things.