Is cereal a soup?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is cereal a soup?". Your opponent's style: Aristotle

which is better intj or entp

You're asking the wrong question. "Better" is meaningless without context. An INTJ excels at executing a singular vision with ruthless efficiency. An ENTP thrives in debate and adaptive problem-solving but struggles with follow-through. One dominates through focus, the other through flexibility. Put an INTJ in a startup needing pivots, they'll crash. Put an ENTP leading a military operation, it dissolves into endless discussion. Neither is superior, just differently equipped. What matters is fit, not ranking. So stop looking for validation that your type is "better" and ask instead, better at what?

becoming a billionare

ENTP wins here, actually. Your type's weakness is precisely what billionaires need: adaptability. Bezos pivoted Amazon from books to cloud. Musk jumped industries constantly. ENTPs spot opportunities others miss because they're not locked into one "mastermind plan." INTJs execute brilliantly but often within self-imposed constraints. They optimize existing systems rather than demolish and rebuild them. Wealth at that scale requires exploiting inefficiencies, which demands the intellectual restlessness ENTPs possess. Your systematizing strength becomes a cage. The billionaire graveyard is full of INTJs who perfected the wrong vision while markets shifted. Adaptability beats vision every time at that level.