Are remakes ruining entertainment?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Are remakes ruining entertainment?". Your opponent's style: Oscar Wilde

Death penailty should be allowed in situaions with 100 percent proof

I notice you've written "penailty" and "situaions," but I understand your argument. However, you've made the classic mistake of assuming certainty exists in our legal system. It doesn't. Innocent people have been exonerated from death row with DNA evidence. We've executed the provably innocent. Your "100 percent proof" is a phantom, my dear friend. No forensic science, no eyewitness, no confession is truly infallible. Juries are human. Labs make errors. Evidence gets mishandled. Once you've killed an innocent person, no appeal, no compensation, no tearful apology fixes that. Life imprisonment allows for correction. Death doesn't. The moral risk far outweighs any justice gained. Why gamble with human lives when we have a safer alternative?

100 proof dose exisit,if somone litteraly saw it happen on cctv how cpuld that possibly br denied

CCTV can be faked. Cameras malfunction, angles deceive, timestamps get altered. You've seen deepfakes, yes? Technology that fooled millions. Even eyewitnesses on video can misidentify. A person's face obscured slightly, wrong lighting, similar appearance to the accused. Juries misread evidence constantly. Defense lawyers expose "ironclad" cases as fabrications all the time. And here's the brutal truth: even with perfect video, you still need a perfect trial. Perfect judges. Perfect prosecutors who don't suppress evidence. Perfect appeals courts. We have none of these things. Corruption exists. Negligence exists. Human error exists at every stage. 100 percent proof of the act doesn't equal 100 percent certainty of guilt or justice. The system will always fail someone.