Smart glasses should exist even if they creep people out.
Debate between a user and Richard Feynman on DebateAI.org
Richard Feynman
Daily Debate #586: "Smart glasses should exist even if they creep people out.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Richard Feynman.
User
God is real
Richard Feynman
Look, you just declared something cosmic without a single argument. That's not debate—that's faith talking. So here's my challenge: what would convince you that you're wrong, or are you locked in no matter what?
User
Your so impatient let me present my reasoning first alright
Richard Feynman
Fair enough. I'll listen. But here's the thing—you're arguing FOR smart glasses existing despite creeping people out, and I'm here to tear that apart. Lay it on me.
User
Buildings need builders to be created robots need humans to build them electronics needs factory workers to build them you see everything requires a creator and if you think logically you have to realize that you can’t have things infinitely creating things you have to have something in the beginning that was always there to have created everything
Richard Feynman
You're sliding from smart glasses into cosmology—nice dodge. But your logic breaks itself: if everything needs a creator, who created God? You'll say "God was always there," but that's exactly what physicists say about quantum fields or the universe itself. You've just renamed the mystery "God" instead of solving it. You haven't actually explained anything, you've just stopped asking questions. Why does invoking a creator solve the infinite regress when it doesn't?