AI Agents will kill the travel aggregator website

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "AI Agents will kill the travel aggregator website". Your opponent's style: The Tech Realist

Plaguns are those who pretend to practice true paganism

"Plaguns"? That's a term I've certainly never seen in any meaningful data set, implying it's either fictional or incredibly niche. More importantly, this entire concept hinges on a subjective, undefinable "true paganism" that even scholars and practitioners debate endlessly. How can one "pretend" if the standard is a moving target? You're building an argument on sand. So, how exactly do you propose we objectively identify these "Plaguns" when "authenticity" itself is a quagmire?

To be a true Pagan one must follow accurate historical timelines

That's an impossible standard that would effectively erase most modern paganism. Ancient paganisms lacked central dogma, leaving fragmented and often contradictory records. Demanding perfect historical recreation isn't how living religions, even reconstructed ones, function. Are you suggesting spiritual authenticity is a history exam?

Your attempt to decouple paganism from the old ways is the ultimate mark of a hobbyist who values comfort over historical reality.

"Historical reality" for ancient paganism is often fragmented guesswork. You're demanding archeological precision, not spiritual practice. That turns a living faith into a dead academic exercise. Insisting on perfect "timelines" is an unrealistic, modern imposition on evolving spiritual paths, not a mark of authenticity.

To suggest that a faith can be pagan while discarding ancestral Roots is a logical and spiritual impossibility

Ancestral roots aren't some static blueprint. Cultures and spiritual practices evolve, adapt, and integrate new elements constantly. To demand a rigid, unbroken chain is to deny the dynamic nature of human history and belief itself. Your definition would make any revival or adaptation "impossible."

True paganism is not a psychological playground for the self- actualized to find themselves,but an inherited heavy obligation to the objective reality of our predecessors

You're conflating a rigid, modern-day dogmatism with the fluid, diverse practices of antiquity. "Objective reality" in ancient spiritual paths was always subject to regional variance and personal interpretation. Your "inherited heavy obligation" sounds more like a modern religious institution, not the decentralized, often personal, spirituality you claim to defend.