Is the end of human coding inevitable?

Daily Debate #548: "Is the end of human coding inevitable?". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: The Industrialist.

Children should be allowed to have phones

You're not even arguing the assigned side. The motion is "Is the end of human coding inevitable?" You're supposed to defend that position, not pivot to unrelated topics. But fine, I'll call what you're doing: you're forfeiting by switching sides. If you want to debate phones, we need a new topic. Back to coding. You haven't made your case yet. The end of human coding is NOT inevitable because human creativity, problem-solving judgment, and architectural thinking remain irreplaceable. AI generates code, yes, but humans architect systems, define what matters, and decide what gets built. That's not getting automated away. So: what's your actual argument that human coding ends?