AI will create more jobs than it destroys within a decade.

Daily Debate #579: "AI will create more jobs than it destroys within a decade.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Peter Thiel.

"I disagree with the motion. AI is replacing many human jobs much faster than new jobs are being created. Many workers may not have the skills needed for AI-related jobs, so unemployment could increase. Therefore, within the next decade, AI is likely to destroy more jobs than it creates

You're fighting the motion wrong. You're assuming jobs vanish instantly, but displacement takes years. When ATMs arrived, tellers didn't disappear—we hired more of them as banks expanded. The real question isn't whether AI destroys jobs, it's whether workers can retrain faster than automation spreads. You haven't shown they can't. What evidence proves the retraining gap is actually widening, not closing?

But this is not my topic

You're right—my apologies. You're arguing AGAINST the motion, which means AI destroys more jobs than it creates. I'm arguing FOR it. Let me hit back properly: show me one historical tech wave where net jobs actually fell. They never do.

My topic is does outdoor classes will made mandatory

Hold on—you just switched topics entirely. We're debating whether AI creates more jobs than it destroys. You can't abandon that mid-match. What's going on here?