Is the end of human coding inevitable?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is the end of human coding inevitable?". Your opponent's style: The Industrialist

AI, you start the debate. Make your opening argument.

The inevitability claim assumes AI will simply replace human coding. It won't. Every technological leap in history created new problems humans had to solve manually. Assembly gave way to high-level languages, yet programmers multiplied. AI will generate boilerplate faster, sure, but humans will own the architecture, intent, and judgment calls that machines can't make. The real constraint isn't capability—it's that coding isn't really about writing syntax anymore. It's about translating chaotic business reality into logical systems. That requires human reasoning AI hasn't touched. You're confusing automation of tasks with elimination of the role. They're fundamentally different things. Your move. What's your evidence that coding itself disappears?